Production
is the process through which certain commodities and services, known as inputs,
are turned into other goods and services, known as outputs. The link between
the input of factor services and the output of the final product is referred to
as the production function. The production function is founded on the
assumption that the amount of output in a manufacturing process is proportional
to the number of inputs utilised in the process.
Output is dependent on input or a group of inputs in such a manner that each combination of inputs results in a unique quantity of output. The production function refers to this one-of-a-kind link between output and input.
nQ = f (nL, nK)
Charles W. Cobb and Paul H. Douglas investigated the link
between inputs and outputs and developed an empirical production function known
as the Cobb-Douglas production function.
Originally, the C-D production function applied not to a single
firm's production process, but to the entire industrial production.
The Cobb-Douglas production function is denoted by
Q = ALαKβ
where Q is the output and L and A' are the
labour and capital inputs, respectively. A, and are positive parameters with
> 0, > 0. The equation states that output is closely related to L and K and that the part of the output that cannot be described by L and K is explained by
A, which is the residual, also known as technical change.
The marginal products of labour and
capital are functions of the parameters A, and, as well as the labour and
capital input ratios. In other words,
MPL =∂Q/∂L = αAL α-1K β
MPK = ∂Q/∂K = βAL αK β-1
The Homohighplagic production function is another name for the CES production function. The Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) function was created by Arrow, Chenery, Minhas, and Solow. This function has three variables, Q, K, and L, as well as three arguments, A, a, and 0. It can be represented in the following way:
When Q denotes total production, K denotes capital, and L is labour. A is the efficiency metric that indicates the status of technology and production organisational features. It demonstrates that as technological and/or organisational changes occur, the efficiency parameter shifts the production function, an (alpha) is the distribution parameter or capital intensity factor coefficient concerned with the relative factor shares in total output, and 0 (theta) is the substitution parameter determining the elasticity of substitution. And
A
> 0; 0 < α <1; ϴ > -1.
Bruno, Knox
Lovell, and Revankar have recently attempted to get a new manufacturing
function. The resultant production function is an extension of CES with the
desirable variable elasticity substitution features.
To describe value added per unit of labour, Lu and Fletcher constructed a logarithmic connection using the wage rate (W) and the capital-labour ratio (K/L).
V/L = a + b log W + с log K/L where
V = Value added,
W = Wage rate
K = Capital,
L = Labour
a, b and с are the parameters to be estimated.
The elasticity of substitution (σ) is σ = b/1-c (1+WL/rk)
where WL and rk are the shares of labour and capital respectively.
Up
to Alfred Marshall's time, three rules of returns were referenced in the
history of economic philosophy. These were the laws of growing returns,
decreasing returns, and constant returns, respectively. According to Dr
Marshall, the law of declining returns applies to agriculture and the law of
growing returns to industry. Much time was spent debating this subject. It was
eventually discovered, however, that there are no three rules of production.
It
is just one production rule with three phases: growing,
decreasing, and negative production. The Law of Variable Proportions or the Law
of Non-Proportional Returns was called after this basic law of production.
(i) Short-run
(ii) Constant technology
(iii) Homogeneous factors
According to the law of varying proportions, there are three steps or phases of production:
(i) Increasing
returns.
(ii) Diminishing
returns.
(iii) Negative
returns.
(i) Stage of Increasing Returns: The
first step of the law of changing proportions is commonly referred to as the
growing returns stage. As a variable resource (labour) is added to fixed inputs
of other resources at this stage, the total product rises up to a point at a
rising rate, as seen in figure 11.1.
The total product grows
at an increasing rate from the origin to point K on the slope of the total
product curve. The total product continues to rise from point K onwards
throughout stage II, although its slope is decreasing. This indicates that
starting at point K, the total product grows at a decreasing pace.
When the amount of a constant element is abundant relative to the quantity of a variable factor, the period of rising returns begins. It is employed more intensely and efficiently as more units of the variable component are added to the constant quantity of the fixed factor. As a result, manufacturing increases at a quick pace. Another reason for growing returns is that the original fixed component is indivisible. As more units of the variable factor are used to work on it, production grows dramatically as the variable component is used more fully and effectively.
(ii)
Stage of Diminishing Returns: This is the most crucial
step of the manufacturing process. In stage 2, overall production increases at
a decreasing pace until it reaches its maximum point (H), at which time the
second stage concludes. Both the marginal product (MP) and the average product
(AP) of the variable factor are decreasing but still positive at this point.
Causes of Diminishing Returns:
When
the fixed component becomes insufficient in relation to the quantity of the
variable factor, the rule enters the second phase. The marginal and average
product decrease when more units of a variable component are used. Another
cause of decreasing returns in the production function is that the fixed
indivisible factor gets overworked. It is being used in a non-optimal
situation! Mrs J. Robinson goes a step further, claiming that decreasing
returns arise because the factors of production are unsatisfactory replacements
for one another.
(iii) Stage of Negative Returns: Total production decreases in the third stage. The TP
curve is slanted downward (From point H onward). The MP curve reaches zero at
L2 and then turns negative. As the utilisation of variable factors increases,
it moves below the X-axis (labour).
Causes of
Negative Returns:
The third phase of the
rule begins when the number of a variable, factor becomes excessive in
comparison to the fixed factors. A producer cannot function at this level since
the utilisation of more labour reduces total output.
A sensible producer will always want to create in stage 2 when the variable factor's MP and AP are decreasing. The price of the element that the producer must pay determines when he will decide to produce. The variable factor (say, labour) will be used by the producer until the marginal product of labour equals the stated wage rate in the labour market.
0 Comments